The Left in Britain have lost the fucking plot

2009-06-18T15:44:00.000-07:00

William S. Lind is director of the Center for Cultural Conservatism of the Free Congress Foundation.

Political Correctness is intellectual AIDS. Everything it touches it sickens and eventually kills. On America’s college campuses it has diminished freedom of speech, warped curricula, politicized grading and replaced intellectual integrity with vapid sloganeering. In classroom after classroom, professors offer an ideological rant, which students are compelled to regurgitate to get a grade: the vomit returns to the dog. These places—and they are many—are no longer universities, but small, ivy-covered North Koreas.

Just what is Political Correctness? The "Politically Correct" people on your campus really, really don’t want you to know the answer to that question. Why? Because Political Correctness is nothing less than Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms.

The parallels are obvious. First, both classical, economic Marxism and the Cultural Marxism that is Political Correctness are totalitarian ideologies. Both insist on "truths" that are contrary to human nature and experience. Contrary to economic Marxism, there is no such thing as a "classless society," and economic incentives matter. Contrary to Political Correctness, men and women are different, as are their natural roles in society; races and ethnic groups have specific characteristics; and homosexuality is abnormal. Since the only way people will accept the ideologues’ "truths" is if they are forced to, they will be forced—by the full power of the state, if the Marxists of either stripe can control it.

The second parallel is that both classical Marxism and Cultural Marxism have single-factor explanations of history. Classical Marxism argues that all history was determined by ownership of the means of production. The Politically Correct Cultural Marxists say that history is explained by which groups—defined by sex, race, and sexual normality or abnormality—have power over which other groups.

The third parallel is that both varieties of Marxism declare certain groups virtuous and others evil a priori, without regard for the actual behavior of individuals. Thus economic Marxism defined workers and peasants as good and the middle class as evil, and Cultural Marxism defines blacks, Hispanics, Feminist women, homosexuals, and some other minorities as virtuous and white men as evil. Political Correctness does not recognize the existence of non-Feminist women and defines blacks who reject its ideology as whites.

The fourth parallel is in means: expropriation. Economic Marxists expropriated the property of the middle and upper classes and gave it to the state. Cultural Marxists, on campuses and in government, lay penalties on white men and give privileges to the groups they favor. Affirmative action is an example of this kind of expropriation.

Finally, both types of Marxism employ a method of analysis guaranteed to show the correctness of their ideology in every situation. For classical Marxists, the method is Marxist economics. For Cultural Marxists, the method is linguistic: deconstruction. Deconstruction first removes all meaning from "texts," then inserts new meaning: one way or another, the text illustrates the oppression of women, blacks, homosexuals, etc., by white men and Western culture. The intended meaning of the author is irrelevant.

These parallels are not coincidental. They exist because the Cultural Marxism of Political Correctness is in fact derived from classical, economic Marxism, largely through the work of the Frankfurt School.

Following World War I, European Marxists faced a difficult question: why did the proletariat throughout Europe not rise in revolution and establish a new, Marxist order, as their ideology said it would? Two prominent Marxist thinkers, Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg Lukacs in Hungary, came up with an answer: Western culture. Western culture so blinded the workers to their true "class" interests that they could not act on them. So before socialism could come to power, Western culture had to be destroyed. Lukacs in 1919 posed the question, "Who will save us from Western civilization?" As Deputy Commissar for Culture in the Bolshevik Bela Kun government in Hungary that same year, the first thing he did was introduce sex education into Hungarian schools.

In 1923, Lukacs and a group of German Marxist intellectuals founded a "think tank" intended to translate Marxism from economic into cultural terms, the Institute for Social Research at Frankfurt University. The Institute quickly became known as the Frankfurt School. In 1933, when the National Socialists came to power in Germany, the Frankfurt School moved to New York City.

There, its key figures—Theodor Adorno, Erich Fromm and Wilhelm Reich—developed critical theory," a crossing of Marx with Freud that labeled the key components of Western culture "prejudice," i.e., a psychological disease. The "critical theorists" argues that to eliminate "prejudice," Christianity, capitalism and the traditional "patriarchal" family all had to be destroyed.

The connection between the Frankfurt School and the student rebellion of the 1960s was made primarily by a key Frankfurt School member, Herbert Marcuse—the man who in the ‘60s coined the phrase, "Make love, not war." Marcuse’s books Eros and Civilization argued that the tools with which to destroy Western culture were, in effect, sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll. He popularized the Frankfurt School’s ideas in ways the ‘60s student radicals could understand and absorb, and we now know his work as Political Correctness.

So that is Political Correctness’ dirty little secret: it is Marxism, Marxism translated from economics into culture. We know what economic Marxism did to the old Soviet Union. Are we going to permit Cultural Marxism to do the same
thing to the United States?

Or indeed to the United Kingdom.

It is why language is important, and why the marxists are busy destroying the education system. They - the marxists control the language, which they have turned from a fixed, immobile permanent series of definitions into the leet speak so beloved of the texting youth.
Orwell in 1984 suggests this with Newspeak. If you dsetroy the language then how will you fight? How to get an idea across? Without the availability of 100 descriptors of pain, sorrow, joy and extacy - how then? In his essays, of which there are many, he goes back again and again to the subject of languagre - he parodies marxists of their time (the duck-speak of the Inner Party in 1984 stems from this).

TBC

The Marxist fuckers are stealing your children from under your nose.

2009-06-15T12:16:00.000-07:00

What Is Cultural Marxism? by William S. Lind (here):

Cultural Marxism is a branch of western Marxism, different from the Marxism-Leninism of the old Soviet Union. It is commonly known as “multiculturalism” or, less formally, Political Correctness. From its beginning, the promoters of cultural Marxism have knownthey could be more effective if they concealed the Marxist nature of their work, hence the use of terms such as “multiculturalism.”

Cultural Marxism began not in the 1960s but in 1919, immediately after World War I. Marxist theory had predicted that in the event of a big European war, the working class all over Europe would rise up to overthrow capitalism and create communism. But when war came in 1914, that did not happen. When it finally did happen in Russia in 1917, workers in other European countries did not support it. What had gone wrong?

Independently, two Marxist theorists, Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg Lukacs in Hungary, came to the same answer: Western culture and the Christian religion had so blinded the working class to its true, Marxist class interest that Communism was impossible in the West until both could be destroyed. In 1919, Lukacs asked, “Who will save us from Western civilization?” That same year, when he became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the short-lived Bolshevik Bela Kun government in Hungary, one of Lukacs’s first acts was to introduce sex education into Hungary’s public schools. He knew that if he could destroy the West’s traditional sexual morals, he would have taken a giant step toward destroying Western culture itself.

In 1923, inspired in part by Lukacs, a group of German Marxists established a think tank at Frankfurt University in Germany called the Institute for Social Research. This institute, soon known simply as the Frankfurt School, would become the creator of cultural Marxism.

To translate Marxism from economic into cultural terms, the members of the Frankfurt School - - Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Wilhelm Reich, Eric Fromm and Herbert Marcuse, to name the most important - - had to contradict Marx on several points. They argued that culture was not just part of what Marx had called society’s “superstructure,” but an independent and very important variable. They also said that the working class would not lead a Marxist revolution, because it was becoming part of the middle class, the hated bourgeoisie.

Who would? In the 1950s, Marcuse answered the question: a coalition of blacks, students, feminist women and homosexuals.

Fatefully for America, when Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, the Frankfurt School fled - - and reestablished itself in New York City. There, it shifted its focus from destroying traditional Western culture in Germany to destroying it in the United States. To do so, it invented “Critical Theory.” What is the theory? To criticize every traditional institution, starting with the family, brutally and unremittingly, in order to bring them down. It wrote a series of “studies in prejudice,” which said that anyone who believes in traditional Western culture is prejudiced, a “racist” or “sexist” of “fascist” - - and is also mentally ill.

It's why we are defenseless against Jihad.

Most importantly, the Frankfurt School crossed Marx with Freud, taking from psychology the technique of psychological conditioning. Today, when the cultural Marxists want to do something like “normalize” homosexuality, they do not argue the point philosophically. They just beam television show after television show into every American home where the only normal-seeming white male is a homosexual (the Frankfurt School’s key people spent the war years in Hollywood).

After World War II ended, most members of the Frankfurt School went back to Germany. But Herbert Marcuse stayed in America. He took the highly abstract works of other Frankfurt School members and repackaged them in ways college students could read and understand. In his book “Eros and Civilization,” he argued that by freeing sex from any restraints, we could elevate the pleasure principle over the reality principle and create a society with no work, only play (Marcuse coined the phrase, “Make love, not war”). Marcuse also argued for what he called “liberating tolerance,” which he defined as tolerance for all ideas coming from the Left and intolerance for any ideas coming from the Right. In the 1960s, Marcuse became the chief “guru” of the New Left, and he injected the cultural Marxism of the Frankfurt School into the baby boom generation, to the point where it is now America’s state ideology.

The next conservatism should unmask multiculturalism and Political Correctness and tell the American people what they really are: cultural Marxism. Its goal remains what Lukacs and Gramsci set in 1919: destroying Western culture and the Christian religion.

It has already made vast strides toward that goal. But if the average American found out that Political Correctness is a form of Marxism, different from the Marxism of the Soviet Union but Marxism nonetheless, it would be in trouble. The next conservatism needs to reveal the man behind the curtain - - old Karl Marx himself.

Although aimed at Yanks primarily, it is worth placing virtually the whole article here, because it is the best short description of political cirrectness I can find, and I gratefully thank the author.

Many of you will fail to see that the bastards who fill the television, newspapers and commentators of the liberal establishment new media are all part of the cultural Marxist takeover.

Every moment you and your children watch tv, surf the net or read a book, even if you're very careful, because these bastards are clever at placing esoteric messages in amongst quite plain looking media, your opinions are being changed - almost imperceptibly.

Ask yourself - are you more tolerant than you were? Do you find yourself acquiescing more than perhaps previously? I'll bet you are, unless you make a concious effort NOT to be.

Homosexuality? Bisexuality? Promiscuity? Orgy? BDSM? Self Indulgence? Intergenerational Sex (Pederasty) Self Discovery?

As Marcuse proposed above::

"...he argued that by freeing sex from any restraints, we could elevate the pleasure principle over the reality principle and create a society with no work, only play (Marcuse coined the phrase, “Make love, not war”)"

This is why they extol the virtues of homosexuality. They intend to destroy the present societal hierarchy structures through both the control of TV - Eastenders, Channel 4, The Simpsons (noticed how MUCH more PC it is of late?) - and the control of history - negroes in Robin Hood, Merlin, every drama containing a Cop, Doctor, or all-round 'Hero' must have a component which is black/asian/gay (best if it can be mixed race queer). I await a black Chief Constable in 'Heartbeat' any day.

"Today, when the cultural Marxists want to do something like “normalize” homosexuality, they do not argue the point philosophically. They just beam television show after television show into every American home where the only normal-seeming white male is a homosexual...."

And your children believe this to be reality. Because they know no better. Your children are at the mercy of this marxist shit scum 7 hours a day five days a week for thirty weeks a year for eleven years.

They have pushed our society to the cliff edge. We are now in a completely atomized society, wherein anything (almost - no smoking please) goes, however deviant, how self centred, how cruel - 'Reality TV' anyone - how stupid, retarded and destructive.

And while you're out fucking the dog with your black treansexual lover, smoking crack, guzzling Special Brew, watching the latest pederasty storyline on Corrie - what? Do you care?

A revolution without a shot. Your children, dumped in the Sure Start Centre, reading the propaganda, learning the kaux history of Britain, being LOVED and CARED FOR by the BBC and the State.

George Orwell would be proud. All managed wqithout a whimper. No more love - merely lust - no more compassion - just the cruel laughter at the pain of another - no more responsibility - just whatever the fuck you like - no moral order - just the filling of a space in time - no decency - just degeneracy.

Oh, and of course, no God. Nothing to appeal to, no 'higher power', no moral standard (Libertarians - your Liberty stinks, and is itself a creation in it's modern form of the Frankfurt School - Freud combination). There is no philosophical moral or ethical restriction now on the psychopaths who operate at the top. Nothing.

Unless the CULTURE is won back we are lost - look at Obama - Telegraph (UK) - a pal of the communists from the age of TEN!

More general interest links about facets of the culture war of the communists and fellow travellers/useful idiots here:

Link

Link

Link

Link

Link

The Left are the supporters of mass murder - the fuckers.

2009-06-14T13:55:00.000-07:00

The next time some Raggedy Anna or Student Grant with a stack of Sowshalisst Weeerkah comes and hounds you to buy a paper, remind her that Marxism has claimed the lives of one hundred and twenty million (or there about) innocent people in one century, far outstripping the killing machine that Hitler devised.

Shit scared scum.

2009-06-12T10:57:00.000-07:00

The SWP and their useful idiots in UAF are so confident that their message is all love and light, so powerful, so 'right on' that they have had to run away to Harriet Harman, the dull, bent and damaged penny in the shiny coin-purse of life.

harman the Harpe, whose career has franky only existed because the post war labour government created a huge overweening State apparatus, rather fancies herself as a Stalin, or perhaps looking at her, more a Mussolini.

Her proposal is to make certain aprts of the British National Party rule book and it's constitution 'illegal', by altering the propsed 'You Can't Have An Opinion Because Commies Don't Agree With You Act 2009' with something to the following:

That the nasty fascistnazis in the BNP must accept Albainan Child Rapists, Slovenian Killer abnd Psychotic Bomb Makers, and if they don't anyone voting for them will be sent to the Gulag for not less than Twenty Five Years.

The UAF decided, or rather their masters, the Central Committee of the Socialist Workers Party, decided to attack Nick Griffin in public, by egging him.

The paper bag warriors, having given the BNP priceless propaganda here, at the outdoor press conference, are now bereated by the rest of the Left for their actions.

This fucktard - where's the timewarp, slackjaw - made a complete cunt of himself. I gather this reject is the best the SWP can put up:

So - the SWP believes in freedom of speech so will destroy that much vaunted freedom of speech to stop the BNP. Fucktards. And of course Liars. Because in the USSR, your main man Trotsky was a mass murderer of all those he didn't agree with when he was the leader of the Red Army, wasn't he? And after he fell from power in the USSR, supported Stalin by his complete silence, in murdering millions of Russian and Ukrainian peasants, in forced collectivistion sxchemes, didn't he, boys?

The SWP is an example that represents the real danger to Western Civilisation.

Communism.

Poster time

2009-06-11T19:14:00.001-07:00

Griffin wins two seats.

2009-06-11T17:20:00.000-07:00

The 'Left' - of which I used to count myself - really don't know what the fuck to do with Griffin and more broadly, the BNP.

The SWP wants to create another vehicle to build their own 'Revolutionary Party' - just like all the other times the SWP have called for a 'Broad Front', Popular Front' etc. This gang of tossers wrecked the Socialist Alliance, wrecked the 'Respect' movement, and have completely lost the thread recently with the rise of the BNP, with the ANaL (a nasty, sectarian little gang dead and under the water line), having been replaced by the SWP's Unite against Fascism, an equally wanky little gang of tossers, real keyboard warriors.

Much of the Left are absolutely fucking psycho. They cannot see that their own sectarian, stupid cultic cliques (remnants of the Trotsky v Stalin days) babble about Naaaaartzis, Faaaaaasissts, and concentration camps in WW2. And increasingly, the fuck wits are getting nowhere with the punter in the street.

They haven't grasped that their arselicking the worst kind of Islamist Clerical Fascist scum really doesn't chime well with the real working class (remember you slack-jawed cunts? the proletariat you used to wank wank over at night, until you realise that the average lad and lass on the council estates don't give a flying fuck about Trotsky?), who just weant better money, better jobs, more white goods and more beer in the pot , and had awa' an' shite wi' y' bollocks about Scientific Socialism.

When he took control of the BNP Griffin stopped the marches. He ended the game the Left liked to play. He rid the BNP of the bone head glue sniffers, the readers of the Protocols of Zion, the guys who dressed up as Brownshirts and all the rest of the crank element, and has made the BNP a professional, successful party, voted for by real people, who are the real backbone of the British people.

I remind any slimy little Lefty fuckers reading this that it has been SIXTY years since a left group (the real CPGB) got an MP elected (George Galloway doesn't count: being elected by the collective Mullahs of Mile End isn't the same, and Tommy Sheridan? - a fucking tragedy).

George Orwell had the Left tagged before WW2. You cannot appeal to the Proletariat, because you are a gang of soulless, miserable cranks, who want to force your shitty opinions, like forcing acceptance of every third world rapist, child molester and women trafficker, or that working class children should be introduced to every deviant, sick and perverted idea that the criminally deranged sexual libertines at the top of the teaching profession can devise.

You have dropped the white working class of Britain, because they won't do what you want. For a hundred years you've wanked on about Socialsm, and the best you got? A Labour Government in 1945, which fell to bits after five years. So you import, and keep importing, the most culturally backward, cruel, barbarous and socially retarded races on Earth. They'll vote for you, won't they? The poor bastards little recognise that you hate them as much as you hate the white working peopel, they are just useful idiots for you all aren't they?

You have even shit on your queer comrades. See here and here, and here. in an attempt to gain the support of the Moslems, and keep the support of Afro-Carribeans, you cynical bastards. See - they get a choice of what to like, but no - not the white working class, eh? Any of us express an opinion that doesn't chime with the fucking Frankfurt School and the Politically Correct Gestapo, then we're a Naaaaaaaaaaartzi, right?

I fucking laughed like a drain to see that 700 people had had the guts to vote for the BNP in Ipswich's Chantry Estate, and over 200 over Old Stoke, both gaining over 10% of the vote. Shame there weren't more candidates, the white working class in Ipswich has had the dregs of the political gutter fucking up Ipswich for the last ten years. The BNP could hardly do a worse job that any of the bien peasants of the Democratic Liberal Party of Conservative Labourites. Hundreds of thousands of ounds to keep the Carribean Club open - Yes! Council Houses built? Nil.